Jackie
and Steve Johnson Sandwiched
Barry contributes his assessment as featured in the Wall
Street Journal Online.
BACKGROUND: Ms. Johnson, age 54, is a
lawyer who owns a small business managing clinical-research
trials. Mr. Johnson, 57, sells computer-networking systems
and security equipment. They live in Wichita, Kan., and
have two children in college.
CHALLENGE: Can they afford to retire
at ages 65 and 68 while also laying out a considerable
sum to help Ms. Johnson's 76-year-old mother, who expects
to need financial assistance?
BALANCE
SHEET: The Johnsons have a combined annual
income that averages around $140,000, about $600,000
in retirement savings (primarily mutual funds invested
in large-cap U.S. stocks), $70,000 in cash and a house
valued at $275,000 that's almost paid for. They also
try to save about $20,000 a year combined in her simplified
employee pension and his 401(k).
Overall, about two-thirds of their current investments
are in equities.
ADVICE: The Johnsons are in decent
financial shape, but they need to diversify their holdings,
says Barry Kaplan, a certified financial planner in
Atlanta. Mr. Kaplan suggests adding some midcap and
small-cap stock funds to lower their risk through diversification.
These have the potential to deliver better returns,
helping the couple build up their assets and putting
them in a stronger position to help Ms. Johnson's mother.
Of course, those sectors can also be riskier than big
stocks, so Mr. Kaplan suggests adding some stability
to the portfolio with bond funds, such as Vanguard Group's
Short-Term Bond Index and Inflation-Protected Securities
funds.
Clark Randall, a certified financial planner in Dallas,
suggests that the Johnsons reduce their equity holdings
to about 50% of their current investments from two-thirds.
He also advises them to pursue a strategy that delivers
better income than large caps—and gives them more
assets to make ends meet—while offering stability.
His suggested portfolio: long-term bonds, real-estate
investment trusts that aren't publicly traded, and regulated
hedge funds, such as the Calamos Market Neutral Fund
and the Merger Fund.
As for Ms. Johnson's mother, Mr. Randall suggests that
the Johnsons could buy her house by setting up a mortgage
between themselves, with no lender involved. Over the
next 25 years, the Johnsons would pay Ms. Johnson's
mother about $9,500 annually for the place—about
what they're spending now on their children in college,
both of whom are expected to finish within two years.
But there's a risk here. Mr. Randall is counting on
the house more than doubling in value in the next 25
years to $400,000, at which point the Johnsons could
sell it and fold that money into their savings. If the
house doesn't appreciate enough, the Johnsons have a
slimmer chance of making their money last throughout
retirement.
Both planners think the Johnsons need long-term-care
insurance. "My very rough rule of thumb is that
if your net worth is less than $500,000, you can't afford
[the premiums]. If it's north of $3 million, you can
self-insure," Mr. Kaplan says.
To cover the average cost of daily care in Kansas,
Mr. Kaplan suggests buying a policy that pays at least
$150 a day. It should also include "inflation protection,"
meaning the payments rise with inflation, along with
a "shared care" rider, meaning one spouse
could tap benefits left unused by the other, he says.
|